|
GUEST
初哥級
Posts 0 |
 Posted - 17.01.2002 : 08:19:50
|
假設對手fail咗,例如miss,但係就做咗個咕set,你當然可以叫佢打多cue,但係
又有冇free ball呢?有人話有,有人話冇,究竟有定冇?
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 09:28:48
|
|
照我記憶所及，球例中話咕set唔算係snooker，所以應該無得free波，叫你對手打多cue佢仲頭痕啦，如果打緊fault & miss佢就仲大鑊。 |
 |
|
|
Michael
少校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 721 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 10:32:09
|
|
哈！係喎....又學到野。 |
|
|
|
GUEST
初哥級
Posts 0 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 11:18:36
|
多謝你嘅答覆,小弟另有一問題如下,枱面淨番一套color ball,例如打緊黃波,
對方fail咗,我跟住take free ball,我飛隻綠波,點知撞入咗隻黃,咁都係一個
合法入球,係咪?如果入綠波同時撞入埋隻黃,咁呢cue波直頭得到4分,而個黃波係
唔需要拾番上來,究竟我所知嘅係咪正確呢? |
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 14:33:43
|
|
你個入波就應該係合法，黃波亦唔需要執，只係執隻綠波擺spot點，但究竟計兩分定四分就要ckeck過球例先答到你，因為檯面無理由同時有兩個黃波。 |
|
|
|
dennis19
初青會員
Posts 319 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 21:20:30
|
乜球例唔係話,打唔到要打既波既兩面,就可以free ball咩
奧蘇肥民. |
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 22:12:54
|
奧蘇肥民，原裝英文有關球例如下：
Free Ball - A free ball is a ball which the striker nominates as the ball on when snookered after a foul.
Snookered - The cue-ball is said to be snookered when a direct stroke in a straight line to every ball on is wholly or partially obstructed by a ball or balls not on. If one or more balls on can be struck at both extreme edges free of obstruction by any ball not on, the cue-ball is not snookered....... The cue-ball CANNOT be snookered by a cushion. If the curved face of a cushion obstructs the cue-ball and is closer to the cue-ball than any obstructing ball not on, the cue-ball is NOT snookered. |
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 17.01.2002 : 22:42:28
|
翻查過球例，再次回應???兄之疑問：
If both the nominated ball and a ball on are potted, only the ball on is scored unless it was a RED, when each ball potted is scored. The free ball is then spotted and the ball on remains off the table.
所以???兄所舉的例子只會計一隻黃波之分數，即只加兩度。 |
|
|
咕set問題
