billson
管理員
   
Hong Kong


Posts 3488 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 01:26:19
|
Gilbert 同 Marvin 兩位施主,
菩提本無樹, 明鏡亦非檯, 本來無一物, 何處染塵埃.
正所謂清者自清, 濁者自..........
善哉 ! 善哉 ! |
 |
|
波樓食神
管理員
    

Posts 5153 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 03:27:54
|
又正所謂人有人呀媽,妖有妖..... |
 |
|
kit kit
上校級會員
   
USA


Posts 2309 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 08:13:45
|
大師,出家人依然關心植樹,証明你六根未淨呀
傑傑~~Twins(Gill and Sa)
|
 |
|
波樓食神
管理員
    

Posts 5153 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 11:09:01
|
同0埋佢仲係好咸濕0架。 |
 |
|
marvintai
初哥級

Posts 40 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 22:51:50
|
I just brought a new cue from "My Cue" couple days ago. I just express my opinion and experience. That's all.
Gil,
Give me a break. |
 |
|
Gilbert
初青會員

Posts 81 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 23:06:39
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, The answer is here!!! Thanks Marvin!!! Another case in my pocket!! And this should be the end of my contribution to this argument. Thank you to those who have been following this in the past couple of days. |
 |
|
Gilbert
初青會員

Posts 81 |
Posted - 02.03.2002 : 23:21:54
|
So u have told us lie about the relationship of u and the shop"my cue". Not just that u visited the shop but u also bought a cue from this shop. U told lies because u like this shop a lot and u want other people to go there in order in keep it running, so u made up some rumours about "cheong ching'. As a consequence, u were in breach of the law of defamation.......and u would be responsible for the resulting economic loss in the court.....case closed. |
 |
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
   
Hong Kong


Posts 3471 |
Posted - 03.03.2002 : 08:08:26
|
「白色恐怖」!!!?? 唔好諗錯隔離,我係話比賽時撻死白波真恐怖! |
 |
|
adrian
中校級會員
  

Posts 1245 |
Posted - 03.03.2002 : 10:57:24
|
HaHaHaHaHa
Adrian Wan MBE |
 |
|
GUEST
初哥級

Posts 0 |
Posted - 03.03.2002 : 19:50:14
|
Its actually not case closed. For it to be case closed you would have to prove there existed a direct relationship between his "rumors" and any resulting economic decline. Actually, he is given the right to give his opinion and repeat the opinions of others at his own discretion. If you consider this defamation then websites such as www.epinions.com are a breach of US, HK and Canadian law (as well as many other countries) as it contains volumes of personal, and retold, accounts of poor and negative opinions towards a variety of businesses and services. If you consider that defamation then by all means you are saying that noone is allowed to say anything negative about anything unless there is a clear consensus by everyone that the opinion being stated is a well known fact.
Example: So next time you praise Windows, and put down Apple on paper, computer, or verbally you are defaming or slandering Apple. And conversely, when an Apple user praises Windows, and puts down Windows s/he is defaming Windows.
Of course I would hope with that example you can see how ridiculous the situation actually is. Everyone is afforded the right to express their own opinion. The person, "Marvintai", made 1 negative post about what he heard about whatever billiards store. He is entitled to his opinion, just like you are entitled to calling him a liar. Just like you have your own opinion of him, I have my own as well. He mentiones "My Cue" a lot, and its possible to infer that he works for them or is somehow financially tied to them, but I coudl also say that he might have been a very happy customer with them. If we cannot even express our own opinions, then you can forget defamation, you have killed one of our biggest freedoms in our democracy - free speech.
By the way, regardless of whoever says good or bad about whichever store.
Remember this CAVEAT EMPTOR - Buyer Beware
|
 |
|