|
dragon hon
初哥級
Posts 3 |
 Posted - 05.02.2007 : 07:54:44
|
其實有無曾經有人踢爆過卓球打假球???
我覺得其實卓球比起大多數sport都易出千
d外圍佬會唔會操縱d球手??
|
 |
|
|
cue in hand
少校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 536 |
Posted - 05.02.2007 : 13:34:07
|
我諗作為一個賭徒,會認為凡涉及賭博的,一定會有出千的成份!
但答案無人比到你.我只認為供求既問題,好似足球咁,因超流行有供有求,有市有價,所以一定有出千,桌球呢,因在世界上不很流行,賭博的人不多,犯罪集團會出幾多錢影響賽果呢?
冷靜一擊，創造奇蹟~!~! |
|
|
|
kkre2837
初哥級
Posts 17 |
Posted - 05.02.2007 : 23:20:13
|
quote:其實有無曾經有人踢爆過卓球打假球???
我覺得其實卓球比起大多數sport都易出千
d外圍佬會唔會操縱d球手??
Originally posted by dragon hon
|
[edit] Departure from snooker
Hann is known in snooker for his "bad-boy" image, and in 2002 he was tried in the UK for allegedly raping a woman while both were intoxicated, but was acquitted  .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinten_Hann
Yes Q.Hann is an example
The day after his acquittal The Sun newspaper alleged that Hann had agreed to lose his opening match against Ken Doherty at the China Open in return for large amounts of money [10]. The story was held back so it would not prejudice the outcome of Hann's trial. A hearing at the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association was convened after the WPBSA panel was shown transcripts of video and audio footage of the meetings which took place between Hann and the undercover Sun journalists in March and April 2005.
On Tuesday 14th February he resigned [11]from the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association, just a couple of days before he was due to attend the hearing. Hann did not attend and was found guilty in his absence. The newspaper did not go through with any agreement, but by agreeing to lose the game Hann was in breach of rule 2.8, which states "a member shall not directly or indirectly solicit, attempt to solicit or accept any payment or any form of remuneration of benefit in exchange for influencing the outcome of any game of snooker or billiards."
|
|
|
|
dragon hon
初哥級
Posts 3 |
Posted - 06.02.2007 : 07:14:47
|
thank
|
|
|
|
|
MALTA CUP 準備開鑼喇~!!
