|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
 Posted - 08.06.2003 : 11:07:09
|
屋企無裝有線，所以直到昨晚先至有機會在明珠台睇到傅家俊點樣贏奧蘇利雲，亦同時睇到呢條奧蘇利雲係幾咁無品。 又大大力亂咁救波，又完全唔救直接打落個遮住o既波度，又掉REST，發晒皮四！
飛仙占話齋：如果無波品，D波幾高都唔係好波！
|
|
|
arsir
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3303 |
Posted - 08.06.2003 : 11:47:45
|
睇呢d,好似做show 一樣, 都唔知幾時真幾時假~~~
|
 |
|
|
147
初哥級
Posts 2 |
Posted - 08.06.2003 : 12:19:40
|
Yes, totally agreed!
He did not play seriously and he did not try any snooker in last frame then he gave up ! Very temperamental top snooker player in the world ! He was angey when he missed any potting. |
|
|
|
liwing
少校級會員
Posts 994 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 17:30:50
|
唉... d 叻人寧舍巴閉.
|
|
|
|
keith yau
中校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 1545 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 17:41:49
|
球品好..
人品好.... he he ~~ |
|
|
|
IVAN Wong
少校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 909 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 17:44:53
|
|
我無睇到果場,我好想睇呀！ |
|
|
|
simonlai
中校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 1436 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 18:16:21
|
[updated:LAST EDITED ON Jun-09-03 AT 06:17 PM (GMT)]光頭KICK，
我星期六電視播影無睇到，
因為打緊波嘛 ~~！
但係星期日體育世界就有重播番D精華片段，
事源果 CUE 係咁o既，
奧蘇李雲想輕推白波 snooker 響黃波後面，
點知唔夠力仲爭成隻手指咁多添，
咁亞『FU』就梗係啋你都有味叫佢打多 CUE 架啦 ..
咁當時亞『奧』就好似大大力唔駛包伙食咁一 CUE 打出去，
點知說時遲、那時快 .. 唔駛一秒個白波以超音速
四條 CUSHION 返黎 OFF 番亞『奧』右手邊個尾袋，
期間奇實個白波係排除萬難，一個波都唔撞咁返番黎 OFF 架！
咁又唔駛講啦 .. 亞『FU』就梗係唔打兼被球証罸『不盡力救球』啦！
點知就係呢時間，亞『奧』已經似失控而控制唔住內心果一團『火』啦！
但係最失儀態兼無品就佢一 CUE 打落黃波果度嘛！
其實當時都過癮架！因為當時個鏡頭唔係影住亞『奧』同亞『FU』，
而係影住個球証睇下佢點判，見住個球証眼仔碌碌咁，真係好鬼攪笑！
因為當時亞『奧』打出一 CUE 唔單止中黃波，仲打散埋堆紅波，
所以都係果隻架啦 .. 亞『FU』一係打，一係俾下家打，
咁當時亞『FU』都好平靜而自己打番！
事源就係咁啦！不過唔知其他『高人』仲有無補充呢？
呵呵呵 ~~
好耐都無一口氣打咁多字囉 ~~ HAPPY!!
 |
|
|
|
IVAN Wong
少校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 909 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 18:33:22
|
|
唔該哂,但係我都好想睇！ |
|
|
|
black
少校級會員
Posts 952 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 20:22:05
|
|
我都想呀....仲未睇! |
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 09.06.2003 : 20:50:29
|
唯一補充，奧蘇o個CUE好似無四條CUSHION咁多，應該得三條。 右邊下CUSHION、頂CUSHION、同左邊上CUSHION，然後毫無水花地直躂黃波袋。
其實奧蘇咁打法絕對無任何放守意識，不論救唔救中都好大機會輸CHANCE，如果個白波唔跌落袋可能仲大鑊！ |
|
|
|
simonlai
中校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 1436 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 00:23:48
|
ohhh ..
thank you my brother b! |
|
|
|
tung
初青會員
Posts 169 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 15:14:40
|
|
尋日我睇ESPN 02 premier league R. O'Sullivan V, J. White就見到J. White俾R. O'Sullivan打7:0發脾氣掟波棄權, 雖然覺得J. White好無風度, 但係又有小小心酸....80年代高手竟然俾後輩打到無得玩.....假假地J.White試過少過4分鐘打過百.... |
|
|
|
William WL
初哥級
Posts 9 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 16:38:13
|
|
Yes, I am also a Jimmy White's fan. The previous top player is different to win game against the nowaday top player. Maybe he can plot only but nowaday snooker player can plot and play safe as well ! |
|
|
|
William WL
初哥級
Posts 9 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 16:42:43
|
|
I think when previous top players vs the new youngsters and all the pressure will be on them. Maybe it is one reason they didn't play well in the match. |
|
|
|
tung
初青會員
Posts 169 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 17:08:38
|
我就唔係好認同現代球手打safe好過以前80年代球手(尤其是S. Davis, C. Thorburn, Dennis Taylor), 不過佢地起break程度就真係高好多....
就算呢幾年我見過Steve Davis對住好多依家排頭位既選手, 我都見到佢地都俾Davis set到抓哂頭(係John Higgins同Peter Ebdon有得玩下, 唔計Hendry, 佢係90年代最偉大球手, 佢全盛時間又係好恐怖), 不過Davis就算set到有chance打打下break又失, 無計....相信全盛時期既Davis依家個d甚麼Williams, O'Sullivan, Hunter都要行埋一便, 你睇睇Willie Thorn就知, 甚麼147起break皇根本無得打.... |
|
|
|
B.Hall
上校級會員
Hong Kong
Posts 3471 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 20:44:42
|
完全同意！
而家不論Williams或O'Sullivan，都會較失波要靠齋準補救。
但當年Davis較到隻隻波都係一兩呎距離兼係Easy Shot，如果有時光隧道回到從前，我諗係得Hendry可以同Davis有得Fight。 |
|
|
|
Handy
中校級會員
Posts 1310 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 21:13:56
|
我都同意!!
如果講打快Shot,響袋,走西,奥蘇都未及年輕時嘅Jimmy White咁有型!!
唔好聽D講句,以前Jimmy VS Davis嘅時代,大家都知Davis幾乎贏梗,但係心裡面仍然好想Davis打失一球等下家可以睇JimmyWhite表演....!! |
|
|
|
curry
初哥級
Posts 16 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 21:18:55
|
|
Totally agree with B.Hall ...... the only players which have actually dominated the game of snooker within the last 30 yrs is Davis & Hendry . Joe Davis was the All time greatest ...... the legend from the past . |
|
|
|
tung
初青會員
Posts 169 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 22:32:08
|
以前Davis同Hendry全盛時期邊個對住佢地都面露惶恐之色, 唔至一次我見過檯面淨5隻紅波對手head住66度, Davis話打哂就打哂重要係有幾隻紅波埋哂邊逐隻勾出黎打哂....有時就要加埋一個碌架先得都照搞掂你.....依家d球手邊有呢d class?
依家最慘係球手無風格, 以前幾正, 基夫斯落場支Cue濕完又濕, 度幾十次位先出Cue, 佢又做到喎....Steve Davis既皇者風範, Kirk Stevens就白恤衫白背心白褲白鞋白呔playboy格落場, 文祖就黑恤衫黑褲黑呔成個黑手黨大佬格落場, Alex Higgins就郁黎郁去狂西都打過百, Cliff Thorbun就射唔死你set都set死你(或者悶死你), 肥佬Bill拿住渣啤酒狂隊又打過百(依家Stephen Lee邊夠佢肥), Jimmy White就一定會整兩隻香蕉型Screw Back或者勁發力車前褪後俾你睇, 就算當年已經係老將既Fred Davis推推彈彈淨打Natural Angle都試過過百(我重留有錄影帶, 睇匣A就發覺原來Natural Angle及力水掌握得好, 推推彈彈都過百!), Ray Reardon就成個劉克宣咁既樣坐係Embassy度食煙笑淫淫, 心想"靚仔, 慢慢打, 我羅左5次冠軍上哂岸......."
依家d風格去左邊? |
|
|
|
William WL
初哥級
Posts 9 |
Posted - 10.06.2003 : 23:05:54
|
Hi, I just said J.White is not good to play safe. But I am his fan because he always pot the shots & the cue ball screw back (I don't think anyone can do it again !)
S.Davis, Terry, D.Taylor are good player to play safe and break building. Is S.Davis back to Top Ten in this season ? |
|
|
|
tang
初哥級
Posts 23 |
Posted - 11.06.2003 : 07:06:32
|
i don't agree with the claim that top players of the past are better than those of today.
ask any top players from the 80's and early 90's they would say today's standard is the highest ever.
it may be true that the today's game may look boring(whatever "boring" means) at times.. but i think the reason for that is because the players are too good, and the competition is too fierce. snooker stars today do not appear as "shiny" as before coz it's not as easy for them dominate the game as their predecessors did.
players like Davies and White have done great things in the past, no doubt.. but if they were playing against players of today's quality, i am sure they wouldn't have looked as invincible as they had been. they simply wouldn't have been given as many the chances to make those breaks/shots.
i do agree that today's players/game lack characters, though.. everyone is like a potting machine. |
|
|
無波品
