KCSS
中校級會員
  
Australia


Posts 1103 |
Posted - 10.03.2003 : 20:37:04
|
what different between that two wood??? which better? and what different feeling ?
|
|
maple user
初哥級
Posts 45 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 04:25:09
|
maple比較硬,反應比較直接。ash比較有彈性,但會夾鬚(如果下巴有鬚就唔係好方便la)。 |
 |
|
Alan_W
初青會員


Posts 167 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 07:24:41
|
我個人認為, ash落西會比起maple落多D....棟西係一個例子~ |
 |
|
MT
上校級會員
   
Hong Kong


Posts 3326 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 13:31:00
|
|
Dickson
隊長級會員
    
Hong Kong


Posts 10479 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 15:04:02
|
好囉!舊post 終於有人睇喇!MT 好o野! |
 |
|
MT
上校級會員
   
Hong Kong


Posts 3326 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 17:15:52
|
舊 post 有好多寶架,唔好side呀! |
 |
|
Dickson
隊長級會員
    
Hong Kong


Posts 10479 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 17:45:22
|
係呀!有時見到有用果D 我仲會copy 低o架! |
 |
|
KCSS
中校級會員
  
Australia


Posts 1103 |
Posted - 11.03.2003 : 23:44:23
|
The most popular material for the shaft of the cue is straight-grained ash. The grain should not be too wide: about ten grain lines to the inch (four to the centimetre) looks good and is sufficient to promote the required shaft strength. Maple is also a perfectly good material, but because of its density it does tend to push the cue ball off the intended line when 'side' is applied. In my experience a cue tip size of 0.38in (9.75 mm) allows the ball to hold its intended line more accurately. (The tip size required also depends on the actual stress strength of the particular piece of timber used in the cue.)
Then if order maple 's cue, the tip must use 9.75mm?????? |
 |
|